Research / 04
Understand the import route, documentation and consumer-protection questions raised by the supplied research.
From the supplied change log
Date & status: Effective July 24, 2026: the action specifies an additional 12.5%, subject to exceptions.
Who is affected: Buyers receiving shipped garments and US businesses importing them.
Research action: Require a quotation separating ordinary garment duty from additional duties and carrier charges. (govinfo.gov)
Full change log, caveats & source trail ↗From the supplied change log
Date & status: Worldwide suspension began August 29, 2025. A separate CBP interim final rule, effective June 24, 2026, indefinitely suspended the exemption for non-postal arrivals.
Who is affected: Remote buyers, including those ordering below $800.
Research action: Reject cost estimates that assume a low garment price automatically means duty-free delivery. (content.govdelivery.com)
Full change log, caveats & source trail ↗From the supplied change log
Date & status: General implementation began July 8, 2026.
Who is affected: Importers of products requiring CPSC certification; buyers may experience the consequences through their supplier or carrier.
Research action: Ask whether certification applies or a documented apparel exception supports a disclaimer. (cpsc.gov)
Full change log, caveats & source trail ↗Get three things in writing: the import route, a dated delivered-cost calculation and the identity of the business responsible for correction. Treat…
Development Date and status at the research cut-off Buyers affected What to do now New Section 301 duties on Vietnamese-origin goods Effective July 24…
For an ordinary non-postal shipment, start with the garment’s normal tariff classification, then assess applicable additional duties—not a single…
Do not budget on the former $800 shipment exemption. CBP’s worldwide suspension took effect on August 29, 2025. Its June 24, 2026 rule separately requires…
Accompanied personal baggage deserves a separate calculation. The July Section 301 action expressly excludes personal-use products in accompanied baggage…
It depends on whether the product requires certification and whether relevant apparel enforcement discretion applies. “All clothing needs a new…
The useful buyer-side change is greater emphasis on identifiable sellers, disclosed terms and platform accountability. Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and…
Vietnam’s Personal Data Protection Law has been effective since January 1, 2026. Its enactment is a reason to request current privacy arrangements rather…
There is a stronger enforcement framework, but buyers still need to verify evidence. The FTC’s Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule became effective…
No such certification was established by this research. FTC textile and wool guidance concerns disclosures such as fiber content, country of origin and…
Ask whether the US business is the seller, an importer, a measuring agent or an independently contracted alteration service. Do not infer its role from a…
No later Vietnam-specific replacement rate was established in the official materials reviewed for this report. That is a bounded research finding—not a…
Recommended release conditions for one pilot suit:
Official sources underpin the legal and regulatory statements. Trade commentary, buyer discussions, a trade podcast and CPSC educational material were…
No matching research. Try another term or choose All.
**Research cut-off: October 19, 2026. **
Get three things in writing: the import route, a dated delivered-cost calculation and the identity of the business responsible for correction. Treat privacy, cloth identification and the payment-dispute timetable as parts of the commission—not paperwork to resolve after delivery.
The most consequential recent developments concern US tariffs and low-value shipments, electronic product-compliance filing, and Vietnam’s new e-commerce and personal-data legislation. None should be mistaken for a government guarantee of bespoke workmanship. The practical recommendations below are this desk’s buying controls; legal requirements are identified separately and supported by official sources.
This report addresses personal purchases by US residents, whether commissioned during a Vietnam visit, ordered remotely or supplied through a US business. It is not a binding customs classification, a legal opinion on a particular contract or a promise that an overseas remedy will be enforceable.
| Development | Date and status at the research cut-off | Buyers affected | What to do now |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Section 301 duties on Vietnamese-origin goods | Effective July 24, 2026: the action specifies an additional 12.5%, subject to exceptions. | Buyers receiving shipped garments and US businesses importing them. | Require a quotation separating ordinary garment duty from additional duties and carrier charges. (govinfo.gov) |
| Low-value courier imports remain outside the old de minimis exemption | Worldwide suspension began August 29, 2025. A separate CBP interim final rule, effective June 24, 2026, indefinitely suspended the exemption for non-postal arrivals. | Remote buyers, including those ordering below $800. | Reject cost estimates that assume a low garment price automatically means duty-free delivery. (content.govdelivery.com) |
| CPSC electronic certificate filing is operational | General implementation began July 8, 2026. | Importers of products requiring CPSC certification; buyers may experience the consequences through their supplier or carrier. | Ask whether certification applies or a documented apparel exception supports a disclaimer. (cpsc.gov) |
| Vietnam’s new e-commerce framework took effect | Law No. 122/2025/QH15 and Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP became effective July 1, 2026. | Buyers using Vietnamese online sellers and covered platforms. | Verify seller identity, transaction terms and the platform complaint route before moving payment elsewhere. (moit.gov.vn) |
| Vietnam’s Personal Data Protection Law became effective | Law No. 91/2025/QH15: January 1, 2026. | Buyers supplying identifiable measurements, photographs or other personal information to Vietnamese businesses. | Request a written explanation of collection, sharing, retention and deletion arrangements. (congbao.chinhphu.vn) |
| FTC review-rule enforcement warnings became a current screening signal | Warning letters dated December 22, 2025, followed the rule’s October 21, 2024 effective date. | Buyers relying on reviews, testimonials and purportedly independent rankings. | Examine review incentives and commercial relationships, not just star ratings. (ftc.gov) |
| Two future implementation dates matter | CPSC foreign-trade-zone implementation: January 8, 2027. Statutory repeal of the low-value shipment exemption: July 1, 2027. | Principally import businesses and future remote buyers. | Do not treat either date as permission to ignore requirements already operating in 2026. (cpsc.gov) |
For an ordinary non-postal shipment, start with the garment’s normal tariff classification, then assess applicable additional duties—not a single universal “Vietnam suit tax.” The July action’s Vietnam heading, 9903.05.84, specifies the duty under the applicable garment subheading plus 12.5%, subject to its exceptions. (public-inspection.federalregister.gov)
The action addresses countries’ forced-labor import policies. It is not a finding that every garment from an affected country was itself made with forced labor. USTR describes country-level rates and product exemptions, rather than a fee assessed only after wrongdoing by an individual tailor is established. (ustr.gov)
Do not carry forward an old reciprocal-tariff quotation without checking its legal basis. Executive Order 14389, dated February 20, 2026, terminated specified tariff actions; CBP subsequently updated its tariff records for the ending of IEEPA actions and implementation of Section 122. (govinfo.gov)
The temporary 10% Section 122 surcharge was established for entries beginning February 24, 2026, with an endpoint of July 24, 2026, unless changed as specified in the proclamation. It should not simply be added to a present quotation as though its original period were still running. (whitehouse.gov)
Desk recommendation: if a supplier quotes “20% Vietnam tariff,” “10% global tariff” or “all taxes included,” ask for the entry date, legal authority, tariff headings and exclusions used. A percentage without those details is not a defensible delivered-cost estimate.
Request this worksheet from the carrier, broker or importing seller:
| Required item | What the buyer should receive |
|---|---|
| Garment description | Jacket and trousers, any additional pieces, woven or knitted construction, and fiber composition. |
| Classification | The full proposed HTS classification and explanation of whether the pieces enter as a suit or separately. |
| Origin | The declared garment origin and the manufacturing facts supporting it—not merely the shipment’s departure country. |
| Value | The proposed customs value, with any adjustments explained. |
| Ordinary duty | The applicable garment rate, identified separately. |
| Additional duty | Relevant Chapter 99 heading and any claimed exception. |
| Other charges | Customs fees, brokerage, carrier advancement charges and delivery charges, separately itemized. |
| Accountability | Who makes entry, who initially pays and whether the seller’s delivered-price commitment covers reassessment. |
| Timing | Quote date, expected entry date and recheck point before dispatch. |
This is a recommended evidence request, not a claim that every personal buyer must prepare the entry personally.
For a shipment confirmed to attract the additional 12.5%, $1,500 of customs value produces $187.50 of that additional duty alone. That arithmetic excludes ordinary duty, shipping and fees; it is not a complete import quote. The applicable additional rate comes from the Vietnam tariff heading. (public-inspection.federalregister.gov)
Use a separate line for every unresolved amount. Do not replace an unknown ordinary rate with zero, or label a partial subtotal “delivered cost.” This research does not assign one ordinary tariff rate to all bespoke suits: the live garment classification still needs confirmation.
Do not budget on the former $800 shipment exemption. CBP’s worldwide suspension took effect on August 29, 2025. Its June 24, 2026 rule separately requires non-postal merchandise formerly eligible for that exemption to use formal or informal entry procedures. (content.govdelivery.com)
Two distinctions matter:
What to do now: ask the seller to name the actual service, not merely say “international shipping.” Require confirmation of who supplies the customs information and whether the quoted price includes clearance charges.
For repeat wardrobes, evaluate the real shipment plan. Do not ask a tailor to understate value, describe a purchase as a gift or split documentation to create a false customs picture.
Accompanied personal baggage deserves a separate calculation. The July Section 301 action expressly excludes personal-use products in accompanied baggage from that additional duty. This does not make every carried-home purchase free of ordinary customs duty. (public-inspection.federalregister.gov)
CBP describes an ordinary returning-resident personal exemption of $800 in most cases, subject to conditions including declaration, possession of the goods on return, generally at least 48 hours abroad and no use of that exemption during the preceding 30 days. Goods sent later generally cannot be included in that allowance. (help.cbp.gov)
Recommended customs file:
Declare the purchase and allow CBP to determine the applicable treatment. Do not build the trip’s economics around an assumption that wearing the suit, removing labels or packing it among existing clothes changes the purchase into something that need not be disclosed.
Buying implication: compare collection and shipment only after the fitting plan is credible. A potentially favorable baggage route is not a reason to accept an unfinished or poorly fitted garment before your flight.
It depends on whether the product requires certification and whether relevant apparel enforcement discretion applies. “All clothing needs a new certificate” is too broad. CPSC’s general eFiling implementation began July 8, 2026, but its guidance continues to distinguish products requiring certificates from other cases. (cpsc.gov)
For clothing flammability, CPSC identifies testing exemptions including:
Separately, CPSC states that it exercises certification enforcement discretion for adult apparel exempt from testing under 16 CFR 1610.1(d). Testing exemption, certification treatment and exclusion from the safety standard are not interchangeable concepts. (cpsc.gov)
Please confirm whether this garment requires CPSC certification and eFiling. If you rely on adult-apparel enforcement discretion, identify the basis and confirm that your carrier or broker can handle the appropriate disclaimer.
Request evidence for the finished garment, rather than accepting “wool” as a complete compliance answer. Have the supplier assess relevant components and materials instead of inferring the status of the whole suit from the shell-cloth description.
Buying for personal use does not by itself turn an ordinary seller-to-consumer shipment into a noncommercial transfer. CPSC distinguishes commercial transactions from gifts and transfers of personal effects. (cpsc.gov)
For operational instructions, use the current document library: it lists September 30, 2026 updates to filing guidance and an August 31, 2026 mail-shipment guidance document. Those are implementation resources—not new guarantees about delivery time or garment quality. (cpsc.gov)
The useful buyer-side change is greater emphasis on identifiable sellers, disclosed terms and platform accountability. Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade says the framework effective July 1, 2026 requires intermediary platforms to verify sellers and addresses seller records, complaints, truthful product information and affiliate transparency. (moit.gov.vn)
The law was adopted on December 10, 2025, and applies to domestic and foreign organizations and individuals engaged in e-commerce activities in Vietnam. Its application to a particular cross-border commission still depends on the transaction and participants. (moit.gov.vn)
Ask for:
The Ministry specifically warns that off-platform transactions may lose platform-based verification, refund and dispute mechanisms. An identity-verified seller is not a technically verified bespoke tailor. Treat those as separate checks. (moit.gov.vn)
Do not interpret the new framework as an automatic right to return a custom garment because your preferences changed. This research has not established a universal, unconditional cross-border bespoke-suit return right.
Vietnam’s Personal Data Protection Law has been effective since January 1, 2026. Its enactment is a reason to request current privacy arrangements rather than rely on a generic assurance that photographs are “only for the tailor.” (congbao.chinhphu.vn)
The government’s explanation of Article 31 defines biometric data by reference to distinctive, stable physical or biological characteristics used to identify a person. It also describes specific safeguards for biometric processing. Not every tape measurement or ordinary fitting photograph should automatically be classified as biometric data; the technology and use matter. (xaydungchinhsach.chinhphu.vn)
These are recommended contractual controls, not assertions that every requested term is an unconditional statutory entitlement:
| Information | Recommended control |
|---|---|
| Measurements and pattern records | Define who may access them and whether they are retained for repeat orders. |
| Fitting photographs | Separate production use from permission to publish. |
| Video consultations | Ask whether sessions are recorded and why. |
| AI measurement or visualization | Identify the service provider and ask whether uploads are reused for model development. |
| US fitter–Vietnam workshop sharing | Identify both businesses and the information transferred. |
| Retention | Agree a period and a process for requesting deletion, subject to applicable obligations. |
For the desk’s own quotation-review tools, request redacted order documents by default. Avoid collecting body photographs when an assessment can be performed without them.
There is a stronger enforcement framework, but buyers still need to verify evidence. The FTC’s Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule became effective October 21, 2024. It addresses practices including fake reviews, sentiment-conditioned review incentives and certain falsely independent company-controlled review sites. (ftc.gov)
On December 22, 2025, the FTC warned businesses about potential violations, including compensation conditioned on favorable reviews. These were warnings, not a finding that Vietnamese tailoring reviews generally are false. (ftc.gov)
Recommended shortlist test:
Publish commercial relationships and keep supplier payments separate from ranking decisions. Do not present a supplier-controlled assessment as independent research.
No such certification was established by this research. FTC textile and wool guidance concerns disclosures such as fiber content, country of origin and the responsible business; those disclosures do not document the pattern-development and fitting process promised in a particular commission. (ftc.gov)
Use two separate evidence files:
The second is the desk’s contractual verification framework—not a government-issued bespoke standard. Ask for both rather than accepting a branded cloth label as proof of the entire commission.
Not as a blanket proposition. FTC guidance identifies a specific exception for garments custom-made from material supplied by the consumer. That is narrower than saying every garment ordered to measurements is exempt. For covered US sales, importers must ensure care labels are attached before sale. (ftc.gov)
For a personal purchase collected in Vietnam, obtain written care instructions regardless of the exact US labeling treatment. Ask that the advice address the finished garment, not merely the cloth swatch.
No. CFPB distinguishes billing errors from disputes over defective goods. To preserve relevant billing-error rights, written notice generally needs to reach the card company within 60 calendar days after the charge appeared on the statement; that is not a universal deadline measured from the final fitting. (consumerfinance.gov)
CFPB also describes conditions for withholding an unpaid balance over a purchase dispute, including geographical conditions and a good-faith attempt to resolve the issue. Do not assume an overseas commission automatically satisfies them, or confuse statutory rights with a card network’s additional chargeback procedures. (consumerfinance.gov)
Action: before paying, ask your issuer about custom goods, overseas merchants, deposits, delayed delivery and quality disputes. Keep the specification, payment records, correspondence and correction offers. Do not assume an ongoing remake negotiation extends any deadline.
Yes. The Vietnam Competition Commission confirmed that the Consumer Protection Law 2023 and accompanying regulations took effect on July 1, 2024. This predates the new e-commerce framework and should not be presented as a fresh 2026 change. (en.vcc.gov.vn)
However, this research does not establish the likely cost, speed or outcome of enforcing an individual US buyer’s tailoring dispute in Vietnam. Written responsibilities and proportionate payment stages remain recommended buying controls, not substitutes for legal rights.
Ask whether the US business is the seller, an importer, a measuring agent or an independently contracted alteration service. Do not infer its role from a US telephone number or an appointment address.
Recommended responsibility schedule:
| Issue | Commitment to obtain before deposit |
|---|---|
| Contracting party | Which legal entity owes the garment and any refund? |
| Fitting | Who approves measurements, intermediate fit and final acceptance? |
| Imports | Who arranges entry and pays duty, fees and reassessments? |
| Compliance | Who resolves carrier questions about labels or certificates? |
| Corrections | Who authorizes and pays for local work? |
| Remake | Who decides, on what evidence, and by what deadline? |
| Return shipment | Who supplies instructions and pays each direction? |
| Data | Who receives measurements and photographs, and for what purposes? |
For corrections requiring a return to Vietnam, obtain written return-and-reimport instructions before dispatch. Preserve the original invoice and entry records, and require a new customs assessment if a replacement garment will be supplied. Do not assume that “free remake” means free shipping, clearance or local fitting.
| Watch item | What is known | Recommended response |
|---|---|---|
| CPSC foreign-trade-zone phase | Effective January 8, 2027. | Relevant importing partners should confirm their operating route; this is not the general July 2026 deadline. (cpsc.gov) |
| Statutory de minimis repeal | CBP identifies July 1, 2027 as the statutory repeal date, distinct from the existing suspension. | Do not defer a purchase expecting the former exemption to continue until that date. (public-inspection.federalregister.gov) |
| Vietnam intellectual-property investigation | USTR’s docket records initiation on May 29, 2026. | Monitor for an actual action notice; an investigation is not itself an additional suit tariff. (ustr.gov) |
| Structural excess-capacity investigations | USTR maintains a separate proceeding and official docket. | Check for determinations affecting the relevant origin and garment classification before repeat orders. (ustr.gov) |
No later Vietnam-specific replacement rate was established in the official materials reviewed for this report. That is a bounded research finding—not a guarantee against subsequent changes or litigation. Reconfirm the tariff position immediately before entry.
Recommended release conditions for one pilot suit:
Bottom line: use regulation to improve documentation and accountability, not to infer tailoring quality. If a supplier cannot explain who sells, imports, fits and corrects, pause the deposit—even if its advertised garment price is attractive.
Official sources underpin the legal and regulatory statements. Trade commentary, buyer discussions, a trade podcast and CPSC educational material were used for discovery, not as substitutes for the governing sources. The live ordinary HTS classification and transaction-specific Vietnamese legal application remain matters for confirmation.
https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/july/ustr-takes-action-forced-labor-section-301-investigationshttps://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/fact-sheets/2026/july/fact-sheet-ustr-section-301-action-response-failure-60-economies-ban-imports-produced-forced-laborhttps://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-07-28/html/2026-15181.htmhttps://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-15181.pdfhttps://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD-202600131https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/40b5a00https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/02/imposing-a-temporary-import-surcharge-to-address-fundamental-international-payments-problems/https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/3f01456https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-06-24/html/2026-12670.htmhttps://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2025-09-02/2025-16802https://www.help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article-1402?language=en_UShttps://ustr.gov/trade-topics/enforcement/section-301-investigations/section-301-investigation-vietnams-acts-policies-and-practices-related-intellectual-propertyhttps://ustr.gov/trade-topics/enforcement/section-301-investigations/section-301-structural-excess-capacity-and-production-manufacturing-sectorshttps://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2026/CPSC-Implements-Mandatory-eFiling-for-Certificates-of-Compliance-Targeting-Dangerous-Foreign-Importshttps://www.cpsc.gov/FAQ/eFiling-Frequently-Asked-Questions-FAQhttps://www.cpsc.gov/Business--Manufacturing/Business-Education/Business-Guidance/Certificateshttps://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/Flammability%20of%20Clothing%20Textiles%20Test%20Manual_1610.pdfhttps://www.cpsc.gov/Business--Manufacturing/Testing-Certification/Lab-Accreditation/Rules-Requiring-a-General-Certificate-of-Conformityhttps://www.cpsc.gov/eFiling-Document-Libraryhttps://moit.gov.vn/en/news/ministry-of-industry-and-trade-disseminates-the-law-on-e-commerce-and-government-decree-no.-248-2026-nd-cp.htmlhttps://moit.gov.vn/en/news/plan-to-implement-the-law-on-e-commerce.htmlhttps://moit.gov.vn/en/news/latest-news/the-national-assembly-officially-passes-the-e-commerce-law.htmlhttps://congbao.chinhphu.vn/van-ban/luat-so-91-2025-qh15-45578.htmhttps://congbao.chinhphu.vn/van-ban-dang-cong-bao/quoc-hoi-c31/trang-11.htmhttps://xaydungchinhsach.chinhphu.vn/quy-dinh-bao-ve-du-lieu-ca-nhan-doi-voi-du-lieu-vi-tri-ca-nhan-du-lieu-sinh-trac-hoc-119250730155653784.htmhttps://en.vcc.gov.vn/default.aspx?category_id=3e729e1f-c11c-41a1-abd6-783934675014&do=detail&id=3eeded5a-1dda-4bec-a31a-04d40dece5c7&page=newshttps://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/threading-your-way-through-labeling-requirements-under-textile-wool-actshttps://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/clothes-captioning-complying-care-labeling-rulehttps://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/consumer-reviews-testimonials-rule-questions-answershttps://search.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2025/12/warning-letter-or-ten-businesses-comply-ftcs-consumer-review-rulehttps://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/material-for-release-2026-00567.pdfhttps://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/how-do-i-dispute-a-charge-on-my-credit-card-bill-en-61/https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/how-can-i-get-a-refund-on-a-product-or-service-i-purchased-with-my-credit-card-en-1969/For an ordinary non-postal entry, confirm the garment’s normal HTS duty and any additional duties separately. The July 2026 action specifies an additional 12.5% for Vietnamese-origin goods, subject to exceptions; it is not a universal all-in suit rate. (govinfo.gov)
Do not assume so: the worldwide low-value shipment suspension began August 29, 2025, and CBP separately suspended the exemption for non-postal arrivals by rule effective June 24, 2026. Ask the actual carrier for route-specific clearance and charge information. (content.govdelivery.com)
Yes: the Section 301 action excludes personal-use products in accompanied baggage, while ordinary traveler customs requirements still apply. CBP’s personal allowance is generally $800 subject to conditions, so carried-home goods should not simply inherit a parcel-duty estimate. (public-inspection.federalregister.gov)
No blanket answer is appropriate: certain fabrics qualify for flammability testing exemptions, and CPSC maintains certification enforcement discretion for qualifying adult apparel. Ask the supplier and carrier to document the finished garment’s treatment rather than relying only on the word “wool.” (cpsc.gov)
Confirm the seller’s identity, written transaction terms and complaint process before paying. Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade emphasizes these protections and warns that leaving a platform may remove access to platform-based verification and dispute mechanisms. (moit.gov.vn)
Not necessarily: Vietnam’s government explanation connects biometric data with distinctive, stable physical or biological characteristics used to identify someone. Ask how any scan or photograph is processed, and separately agree its permitted use, sharing and retention. (xaydungchinhsach.chinhphu.vn)
No: billing errors and disputes about defective goods can follow different processes, and eligibility matters. Ask the issuer about overseas custom orders before paying, and preserve relevant billing-error rights with timely written notice rather than assuming the deadline starts at the final fitting. (consumerfinance.gov)
No: FTC guidance identifies an exception for garments custom-made from material provided by the consumer, not every garment made to measurements. Obtain finished-garment care instructions even where the precise labeling obligation needs separate assessment. (ftc.gov)
CPSC’s foreign-trade-zone phase takes effect January 8, 2027, and CBP identifies July 1, 2027 as the statutory repeal date for the low-value shipment exemption. Neither date postpones the general eFiling requirements or shipment suspension already operating in 2026. (cpsc.gov)
](https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/july/ustr-takes-action-forced-labor-section-301-investigations)](https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/fact-sheets/2026/july/fact-sheet-ustr-section-301-action-response-failure-60-economies-ban-imports-produced-forced-labor)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-07-28/html/2026-15181.htm)](https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-15181.pdf)](https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD-202600131)](https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/40b5a00)](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/02/imposing-a-temporary-import-surcharge-to-address-fundamental-international-payments-problems/)](https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/3f01456)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2026-06-24/html/2026-12670.htm)](https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2025-09-02/2025-16802)](https://www.help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article-1402?language=en_US)](https://ustr.gov/trade-topics/enforcement/section-301-investigations/section-301-investigation-vietnams-acts-policies-and-practices-related-intellectual-property)](https://ustr.gov/trade-topics/enforcement/section-301-investigations/section-301-structural-excess-capacity-and-production-manufacturing-sectors)](https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2026/CPSC-Implements-Mandatory-eFiling-for-Certificates-of-Compliance-Targeting-Dangerous-Foreign-Imports)](https://www.cpsc.gov/FAQ/eFiling-Frequently-Asked-Questions-FAQ)](https://www.cpsc.gov/Business--Manufacturing/Business-Education/Business-Guidance/Certificates)](https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/Flammability%20of%20Clothing%20Textiles%20Test%20Manual_1610.pdf)](https://www.cpsc.gov/Business--Manufacturing/Testing-Certification/Lab-Accreditation/Rules-Requiring-a-General-Certificate-of-Conformity)](https://www.cpsc.gov/eFiling-Document-Library)](https://moit.gov.vn/en/news/ministry-of-industry-and-trade-disseminates-the-law-on-e-commerce-and-government-decree-no.-248-2026-nd-cp.html)](https://moit.gov.vn/en/news/plan-to-implement-the-law-on-e-commerce.html)](https://moit.gov.vn/en/news/latest-news/the-national-assembly-officially-passes-the-e-commerce-law.html)](https://congbao.chinhphu.vn/van-ban/luat-so-91-2025-qh15-45578.htm)](https://congbao.chinhphu.vn/van-ban-dang-cong-bao/quoc-hoi-c31/trang-11.htm)](https://xaydungchinhsach.chinhphu.vn/quy-dinh-bao-ve-du-lieu-ca-nhan-doi-voi-du-lieu-vi-tri-ca-nhan-du-lieu-sinh-trac-hoc-119250730155653784.htm)](https://en.vcc.gov.vn/default.aspx?category_id=3e729e1f-c11c-41a1-abd6-783934675014&do=detail&id=3eeded5a-1dda-4bec-a31a-04d40dece5c7&page=news)](https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/threading-your-way-through-labeling-requirements-under-textile-wool-acts)](https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/clothes-captioning-complying-care-labeling-rule)](https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/consumer-reviews-testimonials-rule-questions-answers)](https://search.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2025/12/warning-letter-or-ten-businesses-comply-ftcs-consumer-review-rule)](https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/material-for-release-2026-00567.pdf)](https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/how-do-i-dispute-a-charge-on-my-credit-card-bill-en-61/)Source collection for this chapter · research dated 2026-10-19. Inline citations identify the source supporting each passage.